The peer review process of Journals, including the Nanoscale and Advanced Materials (NSAM), is an integral part of the scientific process, involving the evaluation of manuscripts by independent experts. Its primary objectives are to enhance the quality and reliability of published papers and aid editors in determining which manuscripts to accept. Reviewers provide valuable feedback on various aspects of the manuscript, including its coherence, validity, and writing quality. The final decision by editors considers the recommendations of the reviewers, aiming to reach a consensus or seeking input from additional experts when there are differing opinions. Many journals have adopted online submission systems, which require authors to submit a cover letter and disclose any potential conflicts of interest. It is important to note that while peer review contributes to manuscript quality, it does not guarantee flawless work or identify instances of scientific misconduct. Moreover, not all submitted manuscripts undergo review, as some may be deemed outside the journal's scope or fail to meet the required standards. Journals are encouraged to promote transparency by periodically sharing statistics related to their review processes, such as submission numbers, acceptance rates, and average review timelines.